The Odes of John Keats - Classic Poetry Collection (Belknap Press Hardcover Edition) | Perfect for Literature Lovers, Book Clubs & English Literature Students

Vendler’s ordering of the odes is idiosyncratic but persuasive. Since she never forgets anything she has read she is able to recognize linkages and affinities that pass other analysts by. She perhaps too often allows conjectures to become definitive, but she is indispensable and I am in awe of her.Vendler's look on Keats' odes is quiet interesting. She is suggesting that the ode must be looked at in sequential order in order to understand the full meaning. each ode is a continuation of the other.Helen Vendler at her best with (maybe) her most special poet.Includes Fall of Hyperion which I like almost as much as Nightingale and Urn.Extraordinary and unmissable critical review of KeatsAfter five years since I first studied this work on Keats' Odes (and after continual feasting on her "Art of Shakespeare's Sonnets"), I have returned to Vendler's volume to renewed appreciation of her respectful insight into Keats' creations and processes. The same respectfulness and confident humility that graces her Shakespeare criticism flourishes here - and warrants at least a brief expression of consensus with earlier laudatory reviews.Most significantly for the lover of Keats, Vendler integrates the life and creativity of the seven or so months during which he produced odes that "belong to that group of works in whch the English language finds an ultimate embodiment." She makes explicit the implicit signs of connection among and growth through the Odes (and a key portion of Fall of Hyperion). Connections with Shakespeare, Spenser, and Milton are interwoven skillfully -- as integral parts of Keats' context as were the works of nature and art that are explicitly addressed in the poems.Vendler's work extends much deeper than I can fully follow, and some of it will leave all but English majors in the dust. Let's not let that discourage the rest of us amateur Keats enjoyers - the Introduction alone plus the initial discussion of each of the Odes contain indispensable caresses for the heart of mere mortals.Helen Vendler has created a scholarly, insightful look at the odes of John Keats. The odes comprise about a dozen pages; Vendler's analysis is nearly 300 pages. She analyzes in thoughtful detail six classic odes of Keats, not in isolation, but by emphasizing their complex interrelationships. She argues that each poem reflects the odes preceding it and shaped the subsequent odes. As she states, "For the poet, the completion of one poem is the stimulus for the next; this is particularly true for poems of the same genre."Not surprisingly, Vendler assumes that the reader is reasonably familiar with Keats' better known poetry (Hyperion, Endymion, and, of course, the Odes). As Spenser, Milton, and Wordsworth significantly influenced Keats, some familiarity with these poets is helpful. I found that Vendler requires attention and thought, but in return she provides insightful commentary that leads to a deeper appreciation of Keats' poetic genius.On occasion Vendler's style becomes unnecessarily convoluted. But these instances are rare lapses; her writing is characterized by a clarity that is often absent in modern criticism.She scrupulously credits ideas originating with others, explicitly identifies points of disagreement and differences in interpretation and in the process introduces the reader to a wide range of Keatsian studies. I gained a greater appreciation for modern literary criticism. I even enjoyed reading Vendler's detailed footnotes.OK, I'll be the odd voice out. This book is worth reading. The evocation of the thoughts and ideas swirling around Keats during the time in which he wrote the Odes is thorough and fascinating. If you want get a sense for the poetry and aesthetic currents that *might* have informed Keats, then this is a beautiful book to read.My problem with Vendler is that, all too often (though by no means always), she writes as though what *she* thinks must be what *Keats* thought. She makes claims for Keats' creative thought as though her opinions were given. This is the basis for three stars. In truth, Vendler really has little to no idea what Keats was thinking when he wrote the Odes (nothing beyond what he reveals in his letters). I don't argue with her effort to trace what *might* have been at the root of his thought, but even if her opinion is informed, it remains conjecture. When you immerse yourself in this book, just remember that you are not immersing yourself in the mind or world of Keats, but the mind and world of Vendler. She can't and doesn't speak for John Keats. She speaks for the erudite and exhaustive reader who is Helen Vendler.Helen Vendler" The Odes of John Keats' gives the reader an opportunity to see how the six great odes written in 1819 came to be. She shows how the poems are linked together through words, images, and ideas, starting with the 'Ode to Psyche" and ending with the great ode"To Autumn." Through a close reading of each poem, an examination of each image, and a view of the rhetorical trope, from reduplication to enumeration, which underlies each poem, Vendler provides the reader with a deep understanding of Keats's artistic concerns and meanings.. She demonstrates why Keats' achievement is so extraordinary and provides the critical reader with a method by which s/he may enter into the mind of the poet. For any lover of Keats' poetry, and for any lover of belles lettres, this is a book which belongs in your library.I'm an admirer of Helen Vendler's criticism,most especially via her splendid, and almost painfully detailed work on Shakespeare's sonnets. I don't think her book on Keats is of quite that standard, most useful though it is. There seem to me to be two particular reasons for this: there is a greater body of solid critical work on Keats' Odes than on Shakespeare's sonnets. Here, too, there is a tendency to stray from what she is best at. In her reaching out to the literary cum philosophical obscurities of Foucault and company she appears to be straining to invest the poems with arcane significance beyond the poet's intentions. I don't think that there is anything here to compare with the insights of Cleanth Brooks' essay on Ode on a Grecian Urn or the best of Stillinger's work on the poet. Nevertheless , when she is at her liveliest she does offer some illuminating reading and clearly has a sincere love for her subject.Without any second and third thoughts, without any pesky doubts or paltry hesitations - the best critical work on any major poet, I've ever read. Will be the chef d'oeuvre of Helen Vendler.